Can you walk us through your Citizen Leader Fellowship project? What were the key insights you gained from your study?
Nguyen: My Citizen Leaders Fellowship project was born from a meeting with University leaders, Honor executives, and international student leaders to discuss the disproportionate report rate of Honor offenses for international students. We hypothesize that unconscious biases like spotlighting, which is the tendency of faculty to monitor international students more closely, contribute to the problem. As an international student and an Honor Support Officer, I have the benefit of seeing this issue from both sides. As a result, I decided to conduct an ethnographic study of international students' perception and attitude towards the Honor System for my fellowship project. From this study I gained three important insights and the most glaring is that education about the Honor System is quite lacking. This leads to a perception of Honor as mysterious and untrustworthy, which adds to the existing issues of language and cultural barriers and prevents some international students from seeking out information. The most curious finding is that despite this lack of faith, many international students still strongly believe in the mission of the Honor Code to build and maintain the Community of Trust. I think that with the advent of the new Multi Sanction system there is a real chance for the Honor Committee to fix these problems and build new bridges with the international student community.